I think however that the
problem lies deeper than we care to think. Let us not forget that the
SA Police Service (SAPS) was formed as an integration of the old
South African Police (SAP) and the various homeland police forces.
The SAP was by far the bigger and better equipped organisation and so
inevitably the smaller homeland police forces were absorbed into the
new SAPS. The transition was relatively smooth as the homeland police
forces had been trained by the SAP and were accustomed to the
structure and methods of the SAP. The SAP was a paramilitary police
force. It had military ranks, used military tactics, used military
weapons and received the same if not better military training than
their counterparts in the SADF. SAP members themselves were subject
to strict military type discipline. SAP members who transgressed the
rules were dealt with in a harsh and uncompromising manner.
The SAP was the backbone of
the apartheid state. It was the SAP that enforced the apartheid laws
and this they did with impunity, cruel efficiency and brutality. The
SAP was at the front lines of the oppression of the majority, they
were the faces of the oppressors. Their powers were vast and were
increased as the regime became more paranoid. Violence was a part and
parcel of the SAP, both within the organisation itself and the way it
executed its duties to the regime. As a child growing up in the late
60s and early 70s I will never forget the police raids to check that
every black person in our white area had a “pass” and how those
who did not have a valid “pass” were beaten and bundled into the
back of the old big police vans. It was the SAP who were entrusted
with rooting out dissenters and those who opposed the regime.
Policemen like the notorious Eugene de Kock were given free rein to
interrogate, torture and murder detainees. Deaths in detention were
common. The names of Steve Biko and Neil Aggett immediately spring to
mind but they were but two of thousands who died in police custody.
John Vorster Square in Johannesburg was one of the worst places to be
detained: hundreds died there in police custody either by murder or
suicide. Those who dared to protest in public were dealt with
decisively and with brute force. I will never forget as a student at
Wits University in the late 70s and early 80s how the SAP would move
onto campus with dogs and shamboks to disperse protesting students or
how they would spray the “purple rain” dye onto protesters to
identify them after they had been dispersed. We however were treated
with kid gloves compared to how mass protests by black people were
handled by the SAP. Sharpeville and the Soweto uprising are but two
of many examples of how the SAP dealt with black mass protest: people
were gunned down in cold blood.
The SAPS was formed in the
euphoria of the new rainbow nation. The transformation of the SAPS
was a priority for the new democratic government. There was a
recognition at the time that the SAPS had to move away from being a
paramilitary police force to a community based police service like
that of the United Kingdom. There was also a recognition that the
leadership and structure of the new SAPS had to reflect the
demographics of the country. This process of “transformation”
entailed civilian oversight of the new police service, the
demilitarisation of police ranks and the restructuring of the SAPS so
that it became racially representative. This latter process had its
parallel in the SANDF that was also busy with its own process of
transformation.
It was in this process of
“transformation” that the SAPS made a fundamental and fatal
error. It took over the existing structures of the SAP and
erroneously believed that “transformation” merely entailed
replacing military ranks with non-military ranks and by getting the
racial balance right. There was never any serious attempt to
transform the old SAP structures and systems. The SAP was structured
in such a way to uphold an unlawful regime by force and brutality.
Its methods, systems and values were to dehumanise, brutalise and
subjugate people to the will and laws of that regime. SAP members
themselves were subject to the same systemic brutality within the
organisation. There was never a serious attempt by the SAPS to
interrogate the structures, systems and values they had inherited
from the SAP when the various police forces were integrated into the
SAPS. There was never a serious attempt to engage and deal with the
culture of violence that was inherent in the SAP. Ranks were
demilitarised and military style discipline abolished, but it is
obvious that these well intentioned efforts would fail while the
structures that depended on military style methods and discipline
remained in place. The only time there was a recognition that
structures needed to change was when the now disgraced Commissioner
Selebi abolished special units within the SAPS, which had in the old
SAP been a law unto themselves. Unfortunately, merely abolishing
parts of the old structure was never going to be enough to transform
the SAPS into the Service that is envisaged by our Constitution. The
SAPS was doomed while it stood on the foundations of a morally
corrupt and violent SAP.
I am not surprised that the
SAPS, our politicians and we ordinary citizens (by our tacit support)
are turning back the clock to restructure the SAPS back into an old
style SAP type organisation. It's the only way the system can work
while we continue to ignore the issue of real and meaningful
transformation of the SAPS. Military ranks are back. Special units
are back. There are signs that old military style discipline is
making a comeback. The brutality of the old SAP has already made its
cruel comeback at Marikana, De Doorns, Daveyton and in other places
that have not been reported.
Police brutality. What's
new?
SAP and discipline cannot be mentioned together in the same breath. Not from what I saw from working with them in field as a National Serviceman.
ReplyDelete@Niel. You're correct. I shouldn't generalise. It depended on the commanders on the ground. I lived in Brakpan where the local station commander was strict, ruthless and feared. I watched him in action one day after I had laid a complaint against one of his policemen: it was not a pretty sight.
ReplyDelete